Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 9 authors, 2012-05-17

Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/tlb: optimizing flush_tlb_mm

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-15 10:00:50
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:52 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
It could be warranted to change tlb_flush_mmu to a range API to
avoid doing the per-entry tracking which those architectures do? 
The per-entry could result in a much smaller range, there's no point in
flushing tlbs for unpopulated pages.

Anyway, I don't think even think we'd need to change the API for that,
you could track the entire range through tlb_start_vma() if you wanted
(although nobody does that IIRC).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help