Thread (71 messages) 71 messages, 8 authors, 2012-03-06

Re: [PATCH 30/30] x32: Add x32 VDSO support

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2012-02-21 03:58:45
Also in: lkml

On 02/20/2012 04:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Would it make sense to remove the non-__vdso-prefixed weak symbols?
AFAICT they are somewhere between useless (because the __vdso symbols
are unambiguous), confusing (has anyone not read this and said "huh?"),
and wrong (they are not interchangeable with glibc's symbols as they
return different values).

We're stuck with them on x86-64, but x32 is new and has no
backwards-compatibility issues.
What about non-glibc?

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help