Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-02-17 22:00:45
Also in:
linux-m68k, lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-02-17 22:00:45
Also in:
linux-m68k, lkml
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:54:57 -0800
Is there a -fdata-align or something? Or would __attribute__((packed)) help? Something that explicitly tells gcc "don't do this", instead of "let's add indirection and hope gcc doesn't add alignment for _that_". Especially as the extra pointer makes the code even uglier.
The tracing folks went down the path of trying to use packed in various ways, to no avail, because no matter what they tried it broke other things.
And if we do have to use the pointer thing, let's at least then do the pointer with asms, so that gcc _really_ can't screw it up. Rather than just move the potential bug around.
That's fine with me.