Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: Preemptibility -v6
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-01-24 15:00:16
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:34 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 01/24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:33 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
Index: linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c ===================================================================--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/rmap.c +++ linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c@@ -1559,9 +1559,20 @@ void __put_anon_vma(struct anon_vma *ano * Synchronize against page_lock_anon_vma() such that * we can safely hold the lock without the anon_vma getting * freed. + * + * Relies on the full mb implied by the atomic_dec_and_test() from + * put_anon_vma() against the full mb implied by mutex_trylock() from + * page_lock_anon_vma(). This orders: + * + * page_lock_anon_vma() VS put_anon_vma() + * mutex_trylock() atomic_dec_and_test() + * smp_mb() smp_mb() + * atomic_read() mutex_is_locked()Bah!, I thought all mutex_trylock() implementations used an atomic op with return value (which implies a mb), but it looks like (at least*) PPC doesn't and only provides a LOCK barrier.But, mutex_trylock() must imply the one-way barrier, otherwise it is buggy, no?
If this atomic_read() can leak out of the critical section, then I think mutex_trylock() should be fixed. Or I misunderstood the problem completely...
It implies the LOCK barrier, the one way permeable thing, not a full mb. But I'm not sure the LOCK is sufficient to make the above scenario work.
BTW, from https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/26/213 + * Similar to page_get_anon_vma() except it locks the anon_vma. ... - struct anon_vma *anon_vma = page_get_anon_vma(page); looks like, page_get_anon_vma() becomes unused.
In my current tree there's two left in mm/migrate.c. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-mmu_preempt.git HEAD: 7e23542fae47ed3b811583cb925837e3aa7a3f0f