Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: Preemptibility -v6
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-01-24 14:24:09
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-01-24 14:24:09
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 13:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
The only significant loser, I think,quoted
would be page reclaim (when concurrent with truncation): could spin for a long time waiting for the i_mmap_mutex it expects would soon be dropped?
Well it won't spin (much) but mostly go to sleep if it really takes very long, but then, could it really take much longer than say a lock_page() when reclaim hits a page under IO? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>