Thread (305 messages) 305 messages, 27 authors, 2007-09-11

Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures

From: Segher Boessenkool <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-17 23:58:09
Also in: lkml, netdev

quoted
quoted
#define forget(a)	__asm__ __volatile__ ("" :"=m" (a) :"m" (a))

[ This is exactly equivalent to using "+m" in the constraints, as 
recently
  explained on a GCC list somewhere, in response to the patch in my 
bitops
  series a few weeks back where I thought "+m" was bogus. ]
[It wasn't explained on a GCC list in response to your patch, as
far as I can see -- if I missed it, please point me to an archived
version of it].
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01758.html
Ah yes, that old thread, thank you.
That's when _I_ came to know how GCC interprets "+m", but probably
this has been explained on those lists multiple times. Who cares,
anyway?
I just couldn't find the thread you meant, I thought I missed
have it, that's all :-)


Segher
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help