Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2005-12-15 19:29:39
Also in:
lkml
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2005-12-15 19:29:39
Also in:
lkml
David Howells [off-list ref] wrote:
So... Would you then object to an implementation of a mutex appearing in the tree which semaphores that are being used as strict mutexes can be migrated over to as the opportunity arises?
That would be sane. The semaphore->completion migration didn't hurt.