Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2005-12-14 11:18:01
Also in:
lkml
From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2005-12-14 11:18:01
Also in:
lkml
David Howells wrote:
Nick Piggin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
atomic_cmpxchg should be available on all platforms.Two points: (1) If it's using spinlocks, then it's pointless to use atomic_cmpxchg.
Why?
(2) atomic_t is a 32-bit type, and on a 64-bit platform I will want a 64-bit
type so that I can stick the owner address in there (I've got a second
variant not yet released).I'm sure you could use a seperate field as it would be a debug option, right? But atomic longs are coming along and it is probably feasable to do 64-bit atomic_cmpxchg on all 64-bit word architectures if you really needed that. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com