RE: RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_<something>
From: Maarten Brock <hidden>
Date: 2025-11-14 10:27:07
Also in:
linux-serial, lkml
quoted
A new open flag "O_DO_NOT_TOUCH_ANYTHING" might be the simplest?Okay, to I'm going to toss out a couple suggestions for naming: O_(PRE|FOR|N|NO)?(INIT|CONFIG|START)(DEV|HW|IO)? O_(NO?RESET|PREPARE)(DEV|HW|IO)? O_NO?TOUCH O_NYET ("not yet") I think my personal preference at the moment is either O_NYET or O_PRECONFIG or O_NYET; although it is perhaps a bit more "use case centric" than "what actual effect it has" I think it might be clearer. A -DEV, -HW or -IO suffix would seem to needlessly preclude it being used for future similar use cases for files that are not device nodes. O_NYET ("not yet") is kind of attractive because it has some geekish smirk value, doesn't have "obvious enough" meaning that if you don't know what it does you'll guess rather than looking it up, but once you know you are not going to forget it! There is even precedent: USB 2 already has the NYET packet type meaning just "not yet". The more I'm thinking about it the more am starting to like it...
Personally, I don't much like the O_NYET as it seems to describe not to open the device.
Many of the other combinations have the problem of seeming to do the opposite of what the used wants in some use cases; it seems rather odd to open a device node that you are intending to configure with "O_NOCONFIG".
Don't like this one either.
On the other hand, "O_CONFIG" might be a valid indication of the intent (like O_RDONLY or O_RDWR are indicator of intent), but also has the implication that it *will* cause the device to configure itself. It also would seem to imply that the resulting file descriptor can *only* be used for that purpose.
I do like the O_CONFIG or O_FORCONFIG names. I also like O_PREINIT or O_PRESTART. Kind Regards, Maarten