Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 6 authors, 2023-08-25

Re: [PATCH v13 11/11] LSM: selftests for Linux Security Module syscalls

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Date: 2023-08-25 18:59:52
Also in: linux-security-module, lkml

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:14:15AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 8/25/2023 8:01 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
quoted
These tests look good!

I suggested other tests to add in my previous emails.
Some of the tests you've suggested will be very difficult to implement
in the face of varying LSM configurations. I need to defer them until a
later date.
Sure, some might be difficult, but some bound checks (e.g. extra flags)
should be doable.
quoted
I'd suggest to re-run clang-format -i on them though.
I assume you're recommending a set of options to clang-format
beyond just "-i". The result of clang-format -i by itself is
horrific. 
I just ran clang -i (with the default kernel configuration, which is
taken into account by default). This just add four changes: the PROCATTR
define and three ASSERT*() calls, which are not too uggly IMO.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help