Re: [PATCH v9 16/42] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack.
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2023-06-22 18:27:55
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 19:21 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:10:42PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:quoted
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h@@ -342,7 +342,36 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void*objp); #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK -# define VM_SHADOW_STACK VM_HIGH_ARCH_5 /* Should not be set with VM_SHARED */ +/* + * This flag should not be set with VM_SHARED because of lack of support + * core mm. It will also get a guard page. This helps userspace protect + * itself from attacks. The reasoning is as follows: + * + * The shadow stack pointer(SSP) is moved by CALL, RET, and INCSSPQ. The + * INCSSP instruction can increment the shadow stack pointer. It is the + * shadow stack analog of an instruction like: + * + * addq $0x80, %rsp + * + * However, there is one important difference between an ADD on %rsp + * and INCSSP. In addition to modifying SSP, INCSSP also reads from the + * memory of the first and last elements that were "popped". It can be + * thought of as acting like this: + * + * READ_ONCE(ssp); // read+discard top element on stack + * ssp += nr_to_pop * 8; // move the shadow stack + * READ_ONCE(ssp-8); // read+discard last popped stack element + * + * The maximum distance INCSSP can move the SSP is 2040 bytes, before + * it would read the memory. Therefore a single page gap will be enough + * to prevent any operation from shifting the SSP to an adjacent stack, + * since it would have to land in the gap at least once, causing a + * fault. + * + * Prevent using INCSSP to move the SSP between shadow stacks by + * having a PAGE_SIZE guard gap. + */ +# define VM_SHADOW_STACK VM_HIGH_ARCH_5 #else # define VM_SHADOW_STACK VM_NONE #endifThis is a lot of very x86-specific language in a generic header file. I'm sure there's a better place for all this text.
Yes, I couldn't find another place for it. This was the reasoning: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/07deaffc10b1b68721bbbce370e145d8fec2a494.camel@intel.com/ (local) Did you have any particular place in mind?