Thread (94 messages) flat view 94 messages, 9 authors, 2023-08-01

Re: [PATCH v9 02/42] mm: Move pte/pmd_mkwrite() callers with no VMA to _novma()

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2023-06-13 16:20:25
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-mm, linux-s390, lkml, xen-devel

On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 10:44 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
quoted
Previous patches have done the first step, so next move the callers
that
don't have a VMA to pte_mkwrite_novma(). Also do the same for
I hear x86 maintainers asking to drop "previous patches" ;-)

Maybe
This is the second step of the conversion that moves the callers ...
Really? I've not heard that. Just a strong aversion to "this patch".
I've got feedback to say "previous patches" and not "the last patch" so
it doesn't get stale. I guess it could be "previous changes".
quoted
pmd_mkwrite(). This will be ok for the shadow stack feature, as
these
callers are on kernel memory which will not need to be made shadow
stack,
and the other architectures only currently support one type of
memory
in pte_mkwrite()

Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help