Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-05-01 18:48:53
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-unionfs
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:26 PM Amir Goldstein [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 5:45 PM Chuck Lever [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:13:33AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 16:01 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:quoted
Jan, Following up on the FAN_REPORT_ANY_FID proposal [1], here is a shot at an alternative proposal to seamlessly support more filesystems. While fanotify relaxes the requirements for filesystems to support reporting fid to require only the ->encode_fh() operation, there are currently no new filesystems that meet the relaxed requirements. I will shortly post patches that allow overlayfs to meet the new requirements with default overlay configurations. The overlay and vfs/fanotify patch sets are completely independent. The are both available on my github branch [2] and there is a simple LTP test variant that tests reporting fid from overlayfs [3], which also demonstrates the minor UAPI change of name_to_handle_at(2) for requesting a non-decodeable file handle by userspace. Thanks, Amir. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230417162721.ouzs33oh6mb7vtft@quack3/ (local) [2] https://github.com/amir73il/linux/commits/exportfs_encode_fid [3] https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/exportfs_encode_fid Amir Goldstein (4): exportfs: change connectable argument to bit flags exportfs: add explicit flag to request non-decodeable file handles exportfs: allow exporting non-decodeable file handles to userspace fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles Documentation/filesystems/nfs/exporting.rst | 4 +-- fs/exportfs/expfs.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++--- fs/fhandle.c | 20 ++++++++------ fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 5 ++-- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 4 +-- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 6 ++--- fs/notify/fdinfo.c | 2 +- include/linux/exportfs.h | 18 ++++++++++--- include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 5 ++++ 9 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)This set looks fairly benign to me, so ACK on the general concept.Me also (modulo previous review comments), so Acked-by: Chuck Lever [off-list ref] I assume either Amir or Jeff will take these when they are ready. If I'm wrong, please do let me know and I can take them via the NFSD tree.With your and Jeff's ACKs I think it would be best if Jan takes these changes through the fsnotify tree, because they are only meant to improve fanotify at this point.quoted
quoted
I am starting to dislike how the AT_* flags are turning into a bunch of flags that only have meanings on certain syscalls. I don't see a cleaner way to handle it though.With all the various proposals of file_handle_v2, I still think that the AT_HANDLE_FID is the cleanest in terms of API simplicity. Just trying to document file_handle_v2 and backward compat with file_handle_v1 gives me a headache and documenting AT_HANDLE_FID is a no brainer.
To prove my point, here is the man page draft for AT_HANDLE_FID: https://github.com/amir73il/man-pages/commit/da7e8dc4749ced85ba692073a42724f2bbe5fe3b Thanks, Amir.