Thread (101 messages) 101 messages, 16 authors, 2022-12-02

Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] mm: Introduce memfd_restricted system call to create restricted user memory

From: Kirill A. Shutemov <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-03 16:30:24
Also in: kvm, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml, qemu-devel

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 05:07:00PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:14:04AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:47:38PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
quoted
In v8 there was some discussion about potentially passing the page/folio
and order as part of the invalidation callback, I ended up needing
something similar for SEV-SNP, and think it might make sense for other
platforms. This main reasoning is:

  1) restoring kernel directmap:

     Currently SNP (and I believe TDX) need to either split or remove kernel
     direct mappings for restricted PFNs, since there is no guarantee that
     other PFNs within a 2MB range won't be used for non-restricted
     (which will cause an RMP #PF in the case of SNP since the 2MB
     mapping overlaps with guest-owned pages)
That's news to me. Where the restriction for SNP comes from?
Sorry, missed your first question.

For SNP at least, the restriction is documented in APM Volume 2, Section
15.36.10, First row of Table 15-36 (preceeding paragraph has more
context). I forgot to mention this is only pertaining to writes by the
host to 2MB pages that contain guest-owned subpages, for reads it's
not an issue, but I think the implementation requirements end up being
the same either way:

  https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/24593.pdf
Looks like you wanted restricted memfd to be backed by secretmem rather
then normal memfd. It would help preserve directmap.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help