Re: [PATCH v3 15/37] x86/mm: Check Shadow Stack page fault errors
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2022-11-15 20:04:08
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 12:47 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:35:42PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:quoted
@@ -1331,6 +1345,18 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs*regs, perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address); + /* + * To service shadow stack read faults, unlike normal read faults, the + * fault handler needs to create a type of memory that will also be + * writable (with instructions that generate shadow stack writes). + * In the case of COW memory, the COW needs to take place even with + * a shadow stack read. Otherwise the shared page will be left (shadow + * stack) writable in userspace. So to trigger the appropriate behavior + * by setting FAULT_FLAG_WRITE for shadow stack accesses, even if the + * access was a shadow stack read. + */Clear as mud... So SS pages are 'Write=0,Dirty=1', which, per construction, lack a RW bit. And these pages are writable (WRUSS). pte_wrprotect() seems to do: _PAGE_DIRTY->_PAGE_COW (which is really weird in this situation), resulting in: 'Write=0,Dirty=0,Cow=1'. That's regular RO memory and won't raise read-faults. But I'm thinking RET will trip #PF here when it tries to read the SS because the SSP is not a proper shadow stack page? And in that case you want to tickle pte_mkwrite() to undo the pte_wrprotect() above? So while the #PF is a 'read' fault due to RET not actually writing to the shadow stack, you want to force a write fault so it will re- instate the SS page. Did I get that right?
That's right. I think the assumption that needs to be broken in the readers head is that you can satisfy a read fault with read-only PTE. This is kind of baked in all over the place with the zero-pfn, COW, etc. Maybe I should try to start with that.