Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the initial ram disk
From: Rob Landley <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-30 09:32:08
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, linux-kbuild, linux-security-module, lkml
Subsystem:
filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers:
Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds
On 7/29/22 05:37, Jim Baxter wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Uhm, I guess this could be solved with: https://github.com/openeuler-mirror/kernel/commit/18a502f7e3b1de7b9ba0c70896ce08ee13d052daquoted
and adding initramtmpfs to the kernel command line. You are probably using ramfs, which does not have xattr support.
Oh, here's the actual tested version of the patch wiring up rootfstype=tmpfs to force rootfs to be tmpfs even when you specify root=
diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
index 7058e14ad5f7..dedf27fe9044 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts.c@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ struct file_system_type rootfs_fs_type = { void __init init_rootfs(void) { - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && !saved_root_name[0] && - (!root_fs_names || strstr(root_fs_names, "tmpfs"))) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && (!root_fs_names ? !saved_root_name[0] : + !!strstr(root_fs_names, "tmpfs"))) is_tmpfs = true; }
Signed-in-triplicate-by: Rob Landley [off-list ref] No idea why nobody else has fixed that bug in the past 9 years, seems obvious? Anyway, here's the testing I did using mkroot (ala https://landley.net/toybox/faq.html#mkroot): $ (cd root/x86_64; KARGS='quiet root=potato HANDOFF="/bin/head -n 1 /proc/mounts"' ./run-qemu.sh) | tail -n 3 rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 reboot: Restarting system $ (cd root/x86_64; KARGS='quiet HANDOFF="/bin/head -n 1 /proc/mounts"' ./run-qemu.sh) | tail -n 3 rootfs / rootfs rw,size=121828k,nr_inodes=30457 0 0 reboot: Restarting system $ (cd root/x86_64; KARGS='quiet rootfstype=tmpfs root=potato HANDOFF="/bin/head -n 1 /proc/mounts"' ./run-qemu.sh) | tail -n 3 rootfs / rootfs rw,size=121828k,nr_inodes=30457 0 0 reboot: Restarting system I.E. rootfstype=tmpfs neutralized the root= so it was still tmpfs despite the kernel being explicitly told you weren't going to stay on initramfs (which is still what root= means). With just root= it's still ramfs, with all the "my log file got too big and the system livelocked" and "querying available space always returns zero" that entails.
Can I clarify which filesystem type is supported with this patch series? Is it tmpfs or perhaps a ramdisk?
I believe both tmpfs and ramfs support xattrs? (I know tmpfs does, and fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c plugs simple_getattr() into ramfs_file_operations.setattr so it looks like that would too? Haven't tried it.) This isn't a modification to the filesystem code (ramfs/tmpfs), this is a modification to the boot-time loader (initramfs) that extracts a cpio.gz file into the filesystem. Ramdisks have supported xattrs for years: they fake up a block device out of a chunk of memory and them format it and mount some other filesystem on it, meaning the driver for the other filesystem handles the xattr support. But ramdisks don't use initramfs, they load an image of the preformatted filesystem into the ramdisk block device. Completely separate mechanism, sharing no code with initramfs, depending on the block layer, etc.
quoted
quoted
Thank you, I have tested that patch but the problem remained. Here is my command line, I wonder if there is something wrong. Kernel command line: rw rootfstype=initramtmpfs root=/dev/ram0 initrd=0x500000000 rootwaitIt is just initramtmpfs, without rootfstype=.
The above patch does not go on top of that patch, it's instead of. Rob