Re: [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: Move setting/clearing ptrace_message into ptrace_stop

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 09:44:30AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:21:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

quoted

Today ptrace_message is easy to overlook as it not a core part of
ptrace_stop.  It has been overlooked so much that there are places
that set ptrace_message and don't clear it, and places that never set
it.  So if you get an unlucky sequence of events the ptracer may be
able to read a ptrace_message that does not apply to the current
ptrace stop.

Move setting of ptrace_message into ptrace_stop so that it always gets
set before the stop, and always gets cleared after the stop.  This
prevents non-sense from being reported to userspace and makes
ptrace_message more visible in the ptrace helper functions so that
kernel developers can see it.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>

This looks good to me. Did you happen to run the seccomp selftests
before/after these changes?

I did not.  This is a pure ptrace change.  Do you see a way that seccomp
could be involved?

Sorry, that wasn't clear: seccomp includes a number of ptrace tests as
well, especially involving handling process death, messages, and
signals. I'll give it a spin; so far it seems fine.

-- 
Kees Cook