Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:21:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
quoted
Today ptrace_message is easy to overlook as it not a core part of
ptrace_stop. It has been overlooked so much that there are places
that set ptrace_message and don't clear it, and places that never set
it. So if you get an unlucky sequence of events the ptracer may be
able to read a ptrace_message that does not apply to the current
ptrace stop.
Move setting of ptrace_message into ptrace_stop so that it always gets
set before the stop, and always gets cleared after the stop. This
prevents non-sense from being reported to userspace and makes
ptrace_message more visible in the ptrace helper functions so that
kernel developers can see it.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>
This looks good to me. Did you happen to run the seccomp selftests
before/after these changes?
I did not. This is a pure ptrace change. Do you see a way that seccomp
could be involved?
Eric