On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:45:57PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from Dmitry V. Levin's message of May 20, 2021 11:06 am:
quoted
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:48:47PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
quoted
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:09:25PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
W.r.t breaking ABI, isn't that what PowerPC is trying to do with the new syscall I/F?
No, it's a new independent interface.
Unfortunately, being a new independent interface doesn't mean it isn't
an ABI break. In fact, it was a severe ABI break, and this thread is
an attempt to find a hotfix.
It is an ABI break, that was known. The ptrace info stuff I fixed with
the patch earlier was obviously a bug in my initial implementation and
not intended (sorry my ptrace testing was not sufficient, and thanks for
reporting it, by the way).
Could you check whether tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_syscall_info.c
passes again with your fix, please?
If yes, then PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO is fixed.
By the way, kernel tracing and audit subsystems also use those functions
from asm/syscall.h and asm/ptrace.h, so your ptrace fix is likely to fix
these subsystems as well.
--
ldv