Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 7 authors, 2020-09-22

Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] kernel: Support TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT flag

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-22 19:44:25
Also in: linux-kselftest, lkml

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
Convert TIF_SECCOMP into a generic TI flag for any syscall interception
work being done by the kernel.  The actual type of work is exposed by a
new flag field outside of thread_info.  This ensures that the
syscall_intercept field is only accessed if struct seccomp has to be
accessed already, such that it doesn't incur in a much higher cost to
the seccomp path.

In order to avoid modifying every architecture at once, this patch has a
transition mechanism, such that architectures that define TIF_SECCOMP
continue to work by ignoring the syscall_intercept flag, as long as they
don't support other syscall interception mechanisms like the future
syscall user dispatch.  When migrating TIF_SECCOMP to
TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT, they should adopt the semantics of checking the
syscall_intercept flag, like it is done in the common entry syscall
code, or even better, migrate to the common syscall entry code.
Can we "eat" all the other flags like ptrace, audit, etc, too? Doing
this only for seccomp seems strange.

-- 
Kees Cook
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help