Thanks for taking a look!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:51 PM Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:

Why change all existing callsites so that one callsite can pass in a
different gfp_t?

My initial thought was to change strndup_user to use
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT (or GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT ?) unconditionally.

(Would that work? that would be a simpler change for sure)

In the case it was not wanted, I assumed a good proportion of callers
might do the same on a case-by-case basis (esp. with regards to
enabling accounting).

Also...

why does strndup_user() use GFP_USER?  Nobody will be mapping the
resulting strings into user pagetables (will they?).  This was done by
Al's 6c2c97a24f096e32, which doesn't have a changelog :(

FWIW, I believe related to this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/6/333

It's a bit over my head (is GFP_USER cheaper?) if strndup_user needs
to follow memdup_user

In [patch 2/2],

+       desc = strndup_user(user_desc, SK_MAX_DESC_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);

if GFP_USER is legit then shouldn't this be GFP_USER_ACCOUNT (ie,
GFP_USER|__GFP_ACCOUNT)?

Yes! I'll see clearer if I manage to wrap my head around what
strndup_user should do
Thanks!