Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 7 authors, 2019-10-30

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for reading/writing compressed data

flat view

From: Aleksa Sarai <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-30 23:11:46
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel

On 2019-10-30, Omar Sandoval [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:02:15PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
quoted
On 2019-10-21, Darrick J. Wong [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:38:31AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
quoted
On 2019-10-21, Darrick J. Wong [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:42:40AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
quoted
From: Omar Sandoval <redacted>

Btrfs supports transparent compression: data written by the user can be
compressed when written to disk and decompressed when read back.
However, we'd like to add an interface to write pre-compressed data
directly to the filesystem, and the matching interface to read
compressed data without decompressing it. This adds support for
so-called "encoded I/O" via preadv2() and pwritev2().

A new RWF_ENCODED flags indicates that a read or write is "encoded". If
this flag is set, iov[0].iov_base points to a struct encoded_iov which
is used for metadata: namely, the compression algorithm, unencoded
(i.e., decompressed) length, and what subrange of the unencoded data
should be used (needed for truncated or hole-punched extents and when
reading in the middle of an extent). For reads, the filesystem returns
this information; for writes, the caller provides it to the filesystem.
iov[0].iov_len must be set to sizeof(struct encoded_iov), which can be
used to extend the interface in the future. The remaining iovecs contain
the encoded extent.

Filesystems must indicate that they support encoded writes by setting
FMODE_ENCODED_IO in ->file_open().

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <redacted>
---
 include/linux/fs.h      | 14 +++++++
 include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 26 ++++++++++++-
 mm/filemap.c            | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e0d909d35763..54681f21e05e 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ typedef int (dio_iodone_t)(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
 /* File does not contribute to nr_files count */
 #define FMODE_NOACCOUNT		((__force fmode_t)0x20000000)
 
+/* File supports encoded IO */
+#define FMODE_ENCODED_IO	((__force fmode_t)0x40000000)
+
 /*
  * Flag for rw_copy_check_uvector and compat_rw_copy_check_uvector
  * that indicates that they should check the contents of the iovec are
@@ -314,6 +317,7 @@ enum rw_hint {
 #define IOCB_SYNC		(1 << 5)
 #define IOCB_WRITE		(1 << 6)
 #define IOCB_NOWAIT		(1 << 7)
+#define IOCB_ENCODED		(1 << 8)
 
 struct kiocb {
 	struct file		*ki_filp;
@@ -3088,6 +3092,11 @@ extern int sb_min_blocksize(struct super_block *, int);
 extern int generic_file_mmap(struct file *, struct vm_area_struct *);
 extern int generic_file_readonly_mmap(struct file *, struct vm_area_struct *);
 extern ssize_t generic_write_checks(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
+struct encoded_iov;
+extern int generic_encoded_write_checks(struct kiocb *, struct encoded_iov *);
+extern ssize_t check_encoded_read(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
+extern int import_encoded_write(struct kiocb *, struct encoded_iov *,
+				struct iov_iter *);
 extern int generic_remap_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 				struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
 				loff_t *count, unsigned int remap_flags);
@@ -3403,6 +3412,11 @@ static inline int kiocb_set_rw_flags(struct kiocb *ki, rwf_t flags)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		ki->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
 	}
+	if (flags & RWF_ENCODED) {
+		if (!(ki->ki_filp->f_mode & FMODE_ENCODED_IO))
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		ki->ki_flags |= IOCB_ENCODED;
+	}
 	if (flags & RWF_HIPRI)
 		ki->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
 	if (flags & RWF_DSYNC)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
index 379a612f8f1d..ed92a8a257cb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
@@ -284,6 +284,27 @@ struct fsxattr {
 
 typedef int __bitwise __kernel_rwf_t;
 
+enum {
+	ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_NONE,
+	ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_ZLIB,
+	ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_LZO,
+	ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_ZSTD,
+	ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_TYPES = ENCODED_IOV_COMPRESSION_ZSTD,
+};
+
+enum {
+	ENCODED_IOV_ENCRYPTION_NONE,
+	ENCODED_IOV_ENCRYPTION_TYPES = ENCODED_IOV_ENCRYPTION_NONE,
+};
+
+struct encoded_iov {
+	__u64 len;
+	__u64 unencoded_len;
+	__u64 unencoded_offset;
+	__u32 compression;
+	__u32 encryption;
Can we add some must-be-zero padding space at the end here for whomever
comes along next wanting to add more encoding info?
I would suggest to copy the extension design of copy_struct_from_user().
Adding must-be-zero padding is a less-ideal solution to the extension
problem than length-based extension.
Come to think of it, you /do/ have to specify iov_len so... yeah, do
that instead; we can always extend the structure later.
Just to clarify -- if we want to make the interface forward-compatible
from the outset (programs built 4 years from now running on 5.5), we
will need to implement this in the original merge. Otherwise userspace
will need to handle backwards-compatibility themselves once new features
are added.

@Omar: If it'd make your life easier, I can send some draft patches
	   which port copy_struct_from_user() to iovec-land.
You're right, I didn't think about the case of newer programs on older
kernels. I can do that for the next submission. RWF_ENCODED should
probably translate the E2BIG from copy_struct_from_user() to EINVAL,
though, to avoid ambiguity with the case that the buffer wasn't big
enough to return the encoded data.
Yeah, that seems fair enough. I would've preferred to keep the error
semantics the same everywhere, but adding additional ambiguity to such
error cases isn't a good idea.

It's a bit of a shame we don't have more granular EINVALs to make it
easier to figure out *why* you got an EINVAL (then we wouldn't have had
to abuse E2BIG to indicate to userspace "you're using a new feature on
an old kernel") -- but that's a more generic problem that probably won't
be solved any time soon.

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help