Re: [PATCH v2 for 5.2 08/12] rseq/selftests: arm: use udf instruction for RSEQ_SIG
flat view
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: 2019-06-08 15:52:52
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
----- On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
----- On May 3, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:quoted
Use udf as the guard instruction for the restartable sequence abort handler. Previously, the chosen signature was not a valid instruction, based on the assumption that it could always sit in a literal pool. However, there are compilation environments in which literal pools are not available, for instance execute-only code. Therefore, we need to choose a signature value that is also a valid instruction. Handle compiling with -mbig-endian on ARMv6+, which generates binaries with mixed code vs data endianness (little endian code, big endian data). Else mismatch between code endianness for the generated signatures and data endianness for the RSEQ_SIG parameter passed to the rseq registration will trigger application segmentation faults when the kernel try to abort rseq critical sections. Prior to ARMv6, -mbig-endian generates big-endian code and data, so endianness should not be reversed in that case.And of course it cannot be that easy. This breaks when building in thumb mode (-mthumb). Output from librseq arm32 build [1] (code similar to what is found in the rseq selftests): CC rseq.lo /tmp/ccu6Jw1b.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccu6Jw1b.s:297: Error: cannot determine Thumb instruction size. Use .inst.n/.inst.w instead /tmp/ccu6Jw1b.s:490: Error: cannot determine Thumb instruction size. Use .inst.n/.inst.w instead Makefile:460: recipe for target 'rseq.lo' failed This appears to be caused by a missing .arm directive in RSEQ_SIG_DATA. Fixing with: - asm volatile ("b 2f\n\t" \ + asm volatile (".arm\n\t" \ + "b 2f\n\t" \ gets the build to go further, but breaks at: CC basic_percpu_ops_test.o /tmp/ccpHOMHZ.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccpHOMHZ.s:148: Error: misaligned branch destination /tmp/ccpHOMHZ.s:956: Error: misaligned branch destination Makefile:378: recipe for target 'basic_percpu_ops_test.o' failed I suspect it's caused by the change from: - ".word " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG) "\n\t" \ to + ".arm\n\t" \ + ".inst " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG_CODE) "\n\t" \ which changes the mode from thumb to arm for the rest of the inline asm within __RSEQ_ASM_DEFINE_ABORT. Better yet, there appears to be no way to save the arm/thumb state and restore it afterwards. I'm really starting to wonder if we should go our of our way to try to get this signature to be a valid instruction on arm32. Perhaps we should consider going back to use ".word" on arm32 so it ensures it uses data endianness (which matches the parameter received by the sys_rseq system call), let objdump and friends print it as a literal pool (which it is), and just choose an instruction which has little chances to appear for the cases we care about between ARM32 BE, LE and THUMB. Perhaps a 32-bit palindrome ? Bonus points if this is a trap instruction in common configurations for odd-cases-debugging purposes.
So I'm not particularly proud of the result, but I found a rather ugly way to figure out if we are currently in thumb mode within an inline asm, and restore that mode: test the length of a nop instruction with a ".if" asm statement. Do we want to go for this kind of approach, or should we revert back to a ".word" and accept that the rseq signature before the abort handler will be seen as data rather than an instruction on arm32 ? Is there a better way to do this ? Thanks, Mathieu
diff --git a/include/rseq/rseq-arm.h b/include/rseq/rseq-arm.h
index 1ce9231..b6c36dd 100644
--- a/include/rseq/rseq-arm.h
+++ b/include/rseq/rseq-arm.h@@ -43,7 +43,14 @@ ({ \ int sig; \ asm volatile ("b 2f\n\t" \ + "3:\n\t" \ + "nop\n\t" \ + "4:\n\t" \ + ".arm\n\t" \ "1: .inst " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG_CODE) "\n\t" \ + ".if ((4b - 3b) == 2)\n\t" \ + ".thumb\n\t" \ + ".endif\n\t" \ "2:\n\t" \ "ldr %[sig], 1b\n\t" \ : [sig] "=r" (sig)); \
@@ -125,8 +132,14 @@ do { \ __rseq_str(table_label) ":\n\t" \ ".word " __rseq_str(version) ", " __rseq_str(flags) "\n\t" \ ".word " __rseq_str(start_ip) ", 0x0, " __rseq_str(post_commit_offset) ", 0x0, " __rseq_str(abort_ip) ", 0x0\n\t" \ + "333:\n\t" \ + "nop\n\t" \ + "444:\n\t" \ ".arm\n\t" \ ".inst " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG_CODE) "\n\t" \ + ".if ((444b - 333b) == 2)\n\t" \ + ".thumb\n\t" \ + ".endif\n\t" \ __rseq_str(label) ":\n\t" \ teardown \ "b %l[" __rseq_str(abort_label) "]\n\t"
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com