Re: [PATCH v9 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-06-05 14:44:57
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-06-05 14:44:57
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
Hello, On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:39:50PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
Which means we will enforce the effective values as:
/tg1/tg11:
util_min.effective=0
i.e. keep the child protection since smaller than parent
util_max.effective=800
i.e. keep parent limit since stricter than child
Please shout if I got it wrong, otherwise I'll update v10 to
implement the above logic.Everything sounds good to me. Please note that cgroup interface files actually use literal "max" for limit/protection max settings so that 0 and "max" mean the same things for all limit/protection knobs. Thanks. -- tejun