Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] seccomp: add a way to get a listener fd from ptrace
From: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Date: 2018-10-08 22:28:51
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 09:11:16AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
As an alternative to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_GET_LISTENER, perhaps a ptrace() version which can acquire filters is useful. There are at least two reasons this is preferable, even though it uses ptrace: 1. You can control tasks that aren't cooperating with you 2. You can control tasks whose filters block sendmsg() and socket(); if the task installs a filter which blocks these calls, there's no way with SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_GET_LISTENER to get the fd out to the privileged task.
So for the slow of mind aka me:
I'm not sure I completely understand this problem. Can you outline how
sendmsg() and socket() are involved in this?
I'm also not sure that this holds (but I might misunderstand the
problem) afaict, you could do try to get the fd out via CLONE_FILES and
other means so something like:
// let's pretend the libc wrapper for clone actually has sane semantics
pid = clone(CLONE_FILES);
if (pid == 0) {
fd = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER, &prog);
// Now this fd will be valid in both parent and child.
// If you haven't blocked it you can inform the parent what
// the fd number is via pipe2(). If you have blocked it you can
// use dup2() and dup to a known fd number.
}
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
v2: fix a bug where listener mode was not unset when an unused fd was not available v3: fix refcounting bug (Oleg) v4: * change the listener's fd flags to be 0 * rename GET_LISTENER to NEW_LISTENER (Matthew) v5: * add capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) requirement v7: * point the new listener at the right filter (Jann) Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <redacted> CC: Kees Cook <redacted> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> CC: Eric W. Biederman <redacted> CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> CC: Christian Brauner <redacted> CC: Tyler Hicks <redacted> CC: Akihiro Suda <redacted> --- include/linux/seccomp.h | 7 ++ include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h | 2 + kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++ kernel/seccomp.c | 31 +++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h index 017444b5efed..234c61b37405 100644 --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s) #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER extern void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk); extern void get_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk); +extern long seccomp_new_listener(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off); #else /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */ static inline void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk) {@@ -92,6 +94,11 @@ static inline void get_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk) { return; } +static inline long seccomp_new_listener(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */ #if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h index d5a1b8a492b9..e80ecb1bd427 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ struct seccomp_metadata { __u64 flags; /* Output: filter's flags */ }; +#define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER 0x420e + /* Read signals from a shared (process wide) queue */ #define PTRACE_PEEKSIGINFO_SHARED (1 << 0)diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index 21fec73d45d4..289960ac181b 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c@@ -1096,6 +1096,10 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request, ret = seccomp_get_metadata(child, addr, datavp); break; + case PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER: + ret = seccomp_new_listener(child, addr); + break; + default: break; }diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index 44a31ac8373a..17685803a2af 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c@@ -1777,4 +1777,35 @@ static struct file *init_listener(struct task_struct *task, return ret; } + +long seccomp_new_listener(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off) +{ + struct seccomp_filter *filter; + struct file *listener; + int fd; + + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EACCES;
I know this might have been discussed a while back but why exactly do we require CAP_SYS_ADMIN in init_userns and not in the target userns? What if I want to do a setns()fd, CLONE_NEWUSER) to the target process and use ptrace from in there?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ + filter = get_nth_filter(task, filter_off); + if (IS_ERR(filter)) + return PTR_ERR(filter); + + fd = get_unused_fd_flags(0); + if (fd < 0) { + __put_seccomp_filter(filter); + return fd; + } + + listener = init_listener(task, filter); + __put_seccomp_filter(filter); + if (IS_ERR(listener)) { + put_unused_fd(fd); + return PTR_ERR(listener); + } + + fd_install(fd, listener); + return fd; +} #endifdiff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 5f4b836a6792..c6ba3ed5392e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c@@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args) } #endif +#ifndef PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER +#define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER 0x420e +#endif + #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN #define syscall_arg(_n) (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[_n])) #elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN@@ -3175,6 +3179,70 @@ TEST(get_user_notification_syscall) EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status)); } +TEST(get_user_notification_ptrace) +{ + pid_t pid; + int status, listener; + int sk_pair[2]; + char c; + struct seccomp_notif req = {}; + struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {}; + + ASSERT_EQ(socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, sk_pair), 0); + + pid = fork(); + ASSERT_GE(pid, 0); + + if (pid == 0) { + EXPECT_EQ(user_trap_syscall(__NR_getpid, 0), 0); + + /* Test that we get ENOSYS while not attached */ + EXPECT_EQ(syscall(__NR_getpid), -1); + EXPECT_EQ(errno, ENOSYS); + + /* Signal we're ready and have installed the filter. */ + EXPECT_EQ(write(sk_pair[1], "J", 1), 1); + + EXPECT_EQ(read(sk_pair[1], &c, 1), 1); + EXPECT_EQ(c, 'H'); + + exit(syscall(__NR_getpid) != USER_NOTIF_MAGIC); + } + + EXPECT_EQ(read(sk_pair[0], &c, 1), 1); + EXPECT_EQ(c, 'J'); + + EXPECT_EQ(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, NULL, 0), pid); + listener = ptrace(PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER, pid, 0); + EXPECT_GE(listener, 0); + + /* EBUSY for second listener */ + EXPECT_EQ(ptrace(PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER, pid, 0), -1); + EXPECT_EQ(errno, EBUSY); + + EXPECT_EQ(ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, pid, NULL, 0), 0); + + /* Now signal we are done and respond with magic */ + EXPECT_EQ(write(sk_pair[0], "H", 1), 1); + + req.len = sizeof(req); + EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_RECV, &req), sizeof(req)); + + resp.len = sizeof(resp); + resp.id = req.id; + resp.error = 0; + resp.val = USER_NOTIF_MAGIC; + + EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_NOTIF_SEND, &resp), sizeof(resp)); + + EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid); + EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status)); + + close(listener); +} + /* * Check that a pid in a child namespace still shows up as valid in ours. */-- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers