Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] seccomp: add a way to get a listener fd from ptrace
From: Tycho Andersen <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-27 22:53:46
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 06:20:23PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:11 PM Tycho Andersen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
As an alternative to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_GET_LISTENER, perhaps a ptrace() version which can acquire filters is useful. There are at least two reasons this is preferable, even though it uses ptrace: 1. You can control tasks that aren't cooperating with you 2. You can control tasks whose filters block sendmsg() and socket(); if the task installs a filter which blocks these calls, there's no way with SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_GET_LISTENER to get the fd out to the privileged task. v2: fix a bug where listener mode was not unset when an unused fd was not available v3: fix refcounting bug (Oleg) v4: * change the listener's fd flags to be 0 * rename GET_LISTENER to NEW_LISTENER (Matthew) v5: * add capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) requirement v7: * point the new listener at the right filter (Jann) Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <redacted> CC: Kees Cook <redacted> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> CC: Eric W. Biederman <redacted> CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> CC: Christian Brauner <redacted> CC: Tyler Hicks <redacted> CC: Akihiro Suda <redacted>If you address the two nits below, you can add: Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Thanks!
quoted
include/linux/seccomp.h | 7 ++ include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h | 2 + kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++ kernel/seccomp.c | 31 +++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h index 017444b5efed..234c61b37405 100644 --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s) #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER extern void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk); extern void get_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk); +extern long seccomp_new_listener(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off);Nit: Sorry, I only noticed this just now, but this should have return type int, not long. ptrace_request() returns an int, and an fd is also normally represented as an int, not a long.
Ugh, I could have sworn I checked this. In particular because the other seccomp code that's called from ptrace returns a long too :) I'll fix that for the next version, and send a different patch for the other two.
quoted
#else /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */ static inline void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk) {@@ -92,6 +94,11 @@ static inline void get_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk) { return; } +static inline long seccomp_new_listener(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */ #if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h index d5a1b8a492b9..e80ecb1bd427 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ struct seccomp_metadata { __u64 flags; /* Output: filter's flags */ }; +#define PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER 0x420e + /* Read signals from a shared (process wide) queue */ #define PTRACE_PEEKSIGINFO_SHARED (1 << 0)diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index 21fec73d45d4..289960ac181b 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c@@ -1096,6 +1096,10 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request, ret = seccomp_get_metadata(child, addr, datavp); break; + case PTRACE_SECCOMP_NEW_LISTENER: + ret = seccomp_new_listener(child, addr); + break; + default: break; }diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index 44a31ac8373a..17685803a2af 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c@@ -1777,4 +1777,35 @@ static struct file *init_listener(struct task_struct *task, return ret; } + +long seccomp_new_listener(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long filter_off) +{ + struct seccomp_filter *filter; + struct file *listener; + int fd; + + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EACCES; + + filter = get_nth_filter(task, filter_off); + if (IS_ERR(filter)) + return PTR_ERR(filter); + + fd = get_unused_fd_flags(0);s/0/O_CLOEXEC/ ? If userspace needs a non-cloexec fd, userspace can easily unset O_CLOEXEC; but the reverse isn't true, because it'd be racy.
Sure, will do. Tycho