On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:55:13AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

On Wed, 30 May 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:

quoted

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:42:31AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

quoted

For the sake of simplicity, Linus suggested directly using HASH_MIN_SIZE
such that we have a single fallback.

Where did he suggest that?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/24/1265

Well I think we should respect min_size.  rhashtable users may
fail at insertion time if the table is too small.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt