Re: [PATCH] mm: don't show nr_indirectly_reclaimable in /proc/vmstat
flat view
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2018-04-25 19:37:29
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Roman Gushchin wrote:
Don't show nr_indirectly_reclaimable in /proc/vmstat, because there is no need in exporting this vm counter to the userspace, and some changes are expected in reclaimable object accounting, which can alter this counter.
I don't think it should be a per-node vmstat, in this case. It appears only to be used for the global context. Shouldn't this be handled like totalram_pages, total_swap_pages, totalreserve_pages, etc?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <redacted> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <redacted> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> --- mm/vmstat.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c index 536332e988b8..a2b9518980ce 100644 --- a/mm/vmstat.c +++ b/mm/vmstat.c@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ const char * const vmstat_text[] = { "nr_vmscan_immediate_reclaim", "nr_dirtied", "nr_written", - "nr_indirectly_reclaimable", + "", /* nr_indirectly_reclaimable */ /* enum writeback_stat_item counters */ "nr_dirty_threshold",@@ -1740,6 +1740,10 @@ static int vmstat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg) unsigned long *l = arg; unsigned long off = l - (unsigned long *)m->private; + /* Skip hidden vmstat items. */ + if (*vmstat_text[off] == '\0') + return 0; + seq_puts(m, vmstat_text[off]); seq_put_decimal_ull(m, " ", *l); seq_putc(m, '\n');