On 2018-03-04 10:01, Paul Moore wrote:

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Serge E. Hallyn [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:41:04PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
...

quoted

+static inline bool audit_containerid_set(struct task_struct *tsk)

Hi Richard,

the calls to audit_containerid_set() confused me.  Could you make it
is_audit_containerid_set() or audit_containerid_isset()?

I haven't gone through the entire patchset yet, but I wanted to
quickly comment on this ... I really dislike the
function-names-as-sentences approach and would would greatly prefer
audit_containerid_isset().

I'd be ok with this latter if necessary, but the naming mimics the
existing loginuid naming convention.

quoted

quoted

+{
+     return audit_get_containerid(tsk) != INVALID_CID;
+}

paul moore

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs [off-list ref]
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635