Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2017-05-03

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-05-02 16:34:14
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Djalal Harouni [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
We have to align procfs and modernize it to have a per mount context
where at least the mount option do not propagate to all other mounts,
then maybe we can continue to implement new features. One example is to
require CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the init user namespace on some /proc/* which are
not pids and which are are not virtualized by design, or CAP_NET_ADMIN
inside userns on the net bits that are virtualized, etc.
These mount options won't propagate to previous mounts, and the system
will continue to be usable.

Ths patch introduces the new 'limit_pids' mount option as it was also
suggesed by Andy Lutomirski [1]. When this option is passed we
automatically create a private procfs instance. This is not the default
behaviour since we do not want to break userspace and we do not want to
provide different devices IDs by default, please see [1] for why.
I think that calling the option to make a separate instance
"limit_pids" is extremely counterintuitive.
Ok.
quoted
My strong preference would be to make proc *always* make a separate
instance (unless it's a bind mount) and to make it work.  If that
means fudging stat() output, so be it.
I also agree, but as said if we change stat(), userspace won't be able
to notice if these two proc instances are really separated, the device
ID is the only indication here.
I re-read all the threads and I'm still not convinced I see why we
need new_instance to be non-default.  It's true that the device
numbers of /proc/ns/* matter, but if you look (with stat -L, for
example), they're *already* not tied to the procfs instance.

I'm okay with adding new_instance to be on the safe side, but I'd like
it to be done in a way that we could make it become the default some
day without breaking anything.  This means that we need to be rather
careful about how new_instance and hidepid interact.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help