Re: new ...at() flag: AT_NO_JUMPS
flat view
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-05-01 04:52:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:38:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
It sounds more like AT_NO_ESCAPE ... or AT_BELOW, or something.I considered AT_ROACH_MOTEL at one point... Another interesting question is whether EXDEV would've been better than ELOOP. Opinions?
In support of my homeland, I propose AT_HOTEL_CALIFORNIA. How about EXDEV for crossing a mountpoint and ELOOP for absolute symlinks or invalid ..? (Is there a technical reason why the same AT_ flag should trigger both cases?) --Andy