Thread (64 messages) flat view 64 messages, 6 authors, 2016-08-11

Re: [RFC 4/4] Restartable sequences: Add self-tests for PPC

From: Mathieu Desnoyers <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-28 13:42:20
Also in: lkml

----- On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Boqun Feng boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:59:45AM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
quoted
----- On Jul 27, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Boqun Feng boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
quoted
As rseq syscall is enabled on PPC, implement the self-tests on PPC to
verify the implementation of the syscall.

Please note we only support 32bit userspace on BE kernel.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <redacted>
---
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c |  14 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h       | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
index db25e0a818e5..e2cb1b165f81 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
@@ -75,6 +75,20 @@ static __thread unsigned int yield_mod_cnt, nr_retry;
	"bne 222b\n\t" \
	"333:\n\t"

+#elif __PPC__
+#define INJECT_ASM_REG	"r18"
+
+#define RSEQ_INJECT_CLOBBER \
+	, INJECT_ASM_REG
+
+#define RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(n) \
+	"lwz %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", %[loop_cnt_" #n "]\n\t" \
+	"cmpwi %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", 0\n\t" \
+	"beq 333f\n\t" \
+	"222:\n\t" \
+	"subic. %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", 1\n\t" \
+	"bne 222b\n\t" \
+	"333:\n\t"
#else
#error unsupported target
#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
index 791e14cf42ae..dea0bea52566 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
@@ -138,6 +138,35 @@ do {									\
#define has_fast_acquire_release()	0
#define has_single_copy_load_64()	1

+#elif __PPC__
+#define smp_mb()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
+#define smp_lwsync()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("lwsync" : : : "memory")
+#define smp_rmb()	smp_lwsync()
+#define smp_wmb()	smp_lwsync()
+
+#define smp_load_acquire(p)						\
+__extension__ ({							\
+	__typeof(*p) ____p1 = READ_ONCE(*p);				\
+	smp_lwsync();							\
+	____p1;								\
+})
+
+#define smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep()	smp_lwsync()
+
+#define smp_store_release(p, v)						\
+do {									\
+	smp_lwsync();							\
+	WRITE_ONCE(*p, v);						\
+} while (0)
+
+#define has_fast_acquire_release()	1
Can you check if defining has_fast_acquire_release() to 0 speeds up
performance significantly ? It turns the smp_lwsync() into a
compiler barrier() on the smp_load_acquire() side (fast-path), and
turn the smp_lwsync() into a membarrier system call instead of the
matching smp_store_release() (slow path).
Good point. Here are the numbers:

Power8 PSeries KVM Guest(64 VCPUs, the host has 16 cores, 128 hardware
threads):

                                Counter increment speed (ns/increment)
                             1 thread   2 threads   4 threads   8 threads   16 threads   32 threads
global increment (baseline)     6.5          N/A         N/A         N/A
N/A           N/A
percpu rseq increment           7.0          7.0         7.2         7.2
9.3          14.5
percpu rseq spinlock           18.5         18.5        18.6        18.8
25.5          52.7

So looks like defining has_fast_acquire_release() to 0 could benefit the
cases with more threads in current benchmark. I will send a updated
patch doing this.
Good to know the lwsync barrier overhead kicks in at that level of
workload on Power8.
And as discussed in IRC, I will also remove jump from rseq_finish()
fast-path in powerpc asm in the updated patch as you did for x86 and
ARM.
Allright, thanks!

Mathieu
Regards,
Boqun

quoted
Thanks,

Mathieu
quoted
+
+# if __PPC64__
+# define has_single_copy_load_64()	1
+# else
+# define has_single_copy_load_64()	0
+# endif
+
#else
#error unsupported target
#endif
@@ -404,6 +433,97 @@ bool rseq_finish(struct rseq_lock *rlock,
			: succeed
		);
	}
+#elif __PPC64__
+	{
+		/*
+		 * The __rseq_table section can be used by debuggers to better
+		 * handle single-stepping through the restartable critical
+		 * sections.
+		 */
+		__asm__ __volatile__ goto (
+			".pushsection __rseq_table, \"aw\"\n\t"
+			".balign 8\n\t"
+			"4:\n\t"
+			".quad 1f, 2f, 3f\n\t"
+			".popsection\n\t"
+			"1:\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(1)
+			"lis %%r17, (4b)@highest\n\t"
+			"ori %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@higher\n\t"
+			"rldicr %%r17, %%r17, 32, 31\n\t"
+			"oris %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@h\n\t"
+			"ori %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@l\n\t"
+			"std %%r17, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(2)
+			"lwz %%r17, %[current_event_counter]\n\t"
+			"li %%r16, 0\n\t"
+			"cmpw cr7, %[start_event_counter], %%r17\n\t"
+			"bne cr7, 3f\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(3)
+			"std %[to_write], 0(%[target])\n\t"
+			"2:\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(4)
+			"std %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
+			"b %l[succeed]\n\t"
+			"3:\n\t"
+			"li %%r16, 0\n\t"
+			"std %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
+			: /* no outputs */
+			: [start_event_counter]"r"(start_value.event_counter),
+			  [current_event_counter]"m"(start_value.rseqp->abi.u.e.event_counter),
+			  [to_write]"r"(to_write),
+			  [target]"b"(p),
+			  [rseq_cs]"b"(&start_value.rseqp->abi.rseq_cs)
+			  RSEQ_INJECT_INPUT
+			: "r16", "r17", "memory", "cc"
+			  RSEQ_INJECT_CLOBBER
+			: succeed
+		);
+	}
+#elif __PPC__
+	{
+		/*
+		 * The __rseq_table section can be used by debuggers to better
+		 * handle single-stepping through the restartable critical
+		 * sections.
+		 */
+		__asm__ __volatile__ goto (
+			".pushsection __rseq_table, \"aw\"\n\t"
+			".balign 8\n\t"
+			"4:\n\t"
+			".long 0x0, 1f, 0x0, 2f, 0x0, 3f\n\t" /* 32 bit only supported on BE */
+			".popsection\n\t"
+			"1:\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(1)
+			"lis %%r17, (4b)@ha\n\t"
+			"addi %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@l\n\t"
+			"stw %%r17, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(2)
+			"lwz %%r17, %[current_event_counter]\n\t"
+			"li %%r16, 0\n\t"
+			"cmpw cr7, %[start_event_counter], %%r17\n\t"
+			"bne cr7, 3f\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(3)
+			"stw %[to_write], 0(%[target])\n\t"
+			"2:\n\t"
+			RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(4)
+			"stw %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
+			"b %l[succeed]\n\t"
+			"3:\n\t"
+			"li %%r16, 0\n\t"
+			"stw %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
+			: /* no outputs */
+			: [start_event_counter]"r"(start_value.event_counter),
+			  [current_event_counter]"m"(start_value.rseqp->abi.u.e.event_counter),
+			  [to_write]"r"(to_write),
+			  [target]"b"(p),
+			  [rseq_cs]"b"(&start_value.rseqp->abi.rseq_cs)
+			  RSEQ_INJECT_INPUT
+			: "r16", "r17", "memory", "cc"
+			  RSEQ_INJECT_CLOBBER
+			: succeed
+		);
+	}
#else
#error unsupported target
#endif
--
2.9.0
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help