Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: add membarrier syscall test
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-04 03:36:52
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 15:47 +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
----- On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:33 AM, Michael Ellerman mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:32 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Just to make sure I understand: should we expect that everyone will issue "make headers_install" on their system before doing a make kselftest ? I see that a few selftests (e.g. memfd) are adding the source tree include paths to the compiler include paths, which I guess is to ensure that the kselftest will work even if the system headers are not up to date.It would be really nice if there were a clean way for selftests to include the kernel headers.What's wrong with make headers_install? Or do you mean when writing the tests? That we could fix by adding the ../../../../usr/include path to CFLAGS in lib.mk. And fixing all the tests that overwrite CFLAGS to append to CFLAGS.quoted
Perhaps make should build the exportable headers somewhere as a dependency of kselftests.Yeah the top-level kselftest target could do that I think. Folks who don't want the headers installed can just run the selftests Makefile directly. Does this work for you?diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c361593..c8841d3 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ headers_check: headers_install# Kernel selftest PHONY += kselftest -kselftest: +kselftest: headers_install $(Q)$(MAKE) -C tools/testing/selftests run_testsMy personal experience is that make headers_install does not necessarily play well with the distribution header file hierarchy, which requires some tweaks to be done by the users (e.g. asm vs x86_64-linux-gnu).
OK, I've never had issues. What exactly are you doing and how is it going wrong?
Also, headers_install typically expects a INSTALL_HDR_PATH.
You can specify it, but the default is just usr/, ie. in the kernel directory, that is what I was proposing. (Actually it's $(objtree)/usr).
It would be interesting if we could install the kernel headers into a specific location that is then re-used by kselftest, so using it without too much manual configuration does not require to overwrite the distribution header files to run tests.
I think we can do that now, ie: $ ls /usr/include/linux/membarrier.h ls: cannot access /usr/include/linux/membarrier.h: No such file or directory $ cd linux-next $ make mrproper $ make headers_install ... $ ls usr/include/linux/membarrier.h usr/include/linux/membarrier.h $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=membarrier make: Entering directory '/home/michael/work/topics/selftests/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests' for TARGET in membarrier; do \ make -C $TARGET; \ done; make[1]: Entering directory '/home/michael/work/topics/selftests/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier' gcc -g -I../../../../usr/include/ membarrier_test.c -o membarrier_test make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/michael/work/topics/selftests/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier' make: Leaving directory '/home/michael/work/topics/selftests/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests' $ ./tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY failed. Function not implemented. $ So that seems to be working for me. Are you doing some different work flow, or am I just missing something? I guess it probably doesn't work if you're using O=.. ? cheers