Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 5 authors, 2015-12-13

Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: add membarrier syscall test

From: Mathieu Desnoyers <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-03 15:56:15
Also in: lkml

----- On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:33 AM, Michael Ellerman mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:32 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Just to make sure I understand: should we expect that
everyone will issue "make headers_install" on their system
before doing a make kselftest ?

I see that a few selftests (e.g. memfd) are adding the
source tree include paths to the compiler include paths,
which I guess is to ensure that the kselftest will
work even if the system headers are not up to date.
It would be really nice if there were a clean way for selftests to
include the kernel headers.
What's wrong with make headers_install?

Or do you mean when writing the tests? That we could fix by adding the
../../../../usr/include path to CFLAGS in lib.mk. And fixing all the tests that
overwrite CFLAGS to append to CFLAGS.
quoted
Perhaps make should build the exportable headers somewhere as a dependency of
kselftests.
Yeah the top-level kselftest target could do that I think.

Folks who don't want the headers installed can just run the selftests Makefile
directly.

Does this work for you?
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c361593..c8841d3 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ headers_check: headers_install
# Kernel selftest

PHONY += kselftest
-kselftest:
+kselftest: headers_install
       $(Q)$(MAKE) -C tools/testing/selftests run_tests
My personal experience is that make headers_install
does not necessarily play well with the distribution
header file hierarchy, which requires some tweaks
to be done by the users (e.g. asm vs x86_64-linux-gnu).
Also, headers_install typically expects a INSTALL_HDR_PATH.
It would be interesting if we could install the kernel
headers into a specific location that is then re-used by
kselftest, so using it without too much manual configuration
does not require to overwrite the distribution header files
to run tests.

Thoughts ?

Thanks,

Mathieu
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

cheers
-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help