On 07/06, Andrey Vagin wrote:

-static struct pid *
-get_children_pid(struct inode *inode, struct pid *pid_prev, loff_t pos)
+static struct task_struct *
+task_next_child(struct task_struct *parent, struct task_struct *prev, unsigned int pos)
 {

I won't really argue, just a question...

So this patch changes it to accept/return task_struct rather pid. Why?
it is better to get/put "struct pid" only, not the whole task_struct.

If another caller want task_struct, the necessary conversion is simple.
But again, I won't argue if you think this will complicate the non-proc
users of this helper.

Oleg.