On 03/14, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:38:29AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
quoted
On Saturday 14 March 2015 15:32:35 Oleg Nesterov wrote:
quoted
It is not clear to me what do_wait() should do with ->autoreap child, even
ignoring ptrace.
Just suppose that real_parent has a single "autoreap" child. Should
wait(NULL) hanf then?
It should ignore the child that is set to autoreap. wait(NULL) should return -
ECHILD, indicating there are no children waiting to be reaped.
Right. And I don't think the current code does this. I think we need
to change wait_consider_task to early-return for ->autoreap just as it
does for task_state == EXIT_DEAD.
No. This EXIT_DEAD is absolutely different. And this is another indication
that you might use it wrongly ;)
What we actually want is BUG_ON(task_state == EXIT_DEAD) here. We do not
want the EXIT_DEAD tasks in ->children/ptraced lists. These EXIT_DEAD tasks
complicate the exit/wait/reparent paths.
However, currently this is TODO. The main problem is the locking in
wait_task_zombie(), we can set EXIT_DEAD and remove the task from list
under read_lock().
And please see another email from me. So far I disagree that wait(NULL)
should return ECHILD unconditionally. At least unless this is discussed
separately.
Oleg.