Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 4 authors, 2015-03-14

Re: [PATCH 6/6] clone4: Introduce new CLONE_FD flag to get task exit notification via fd

From: Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-14 14:32:35
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

And let me add another note before I forget...

On 03/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 03/13, josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org wrote:
quoted

A process launching a new process with CLONE_FD is explicitly requesting
that the process be automatically reaped without any other process
having to wait on it.  The task needs to not become a zombie, because
otherwise, it'll show up in waitpid(-1, ...)
This is clear.

But please note that this task can be traced/debugged by unrelated process,
not its real_parent/creator. Say, the system admin does "strace -p". This
simply breaks the current API.

Again, again, I didn't read this series yet. But the proper solution (afaics)
should move this "autoreap" check in release_task/__ptrace_detach(). If the
task is traced. Debugger should check ->autoreap and skip another
do_notify_parent().

Speaking of autoreap... If ->exit_signal is zero, then the exiting child
doesn't send the notification to its parent, still it doesn't autoreap
itself. To me this looks strange, and in fact it seems to me that this
is only by mistake. I am wondering if we can treat ->exit_signal == 0
as "autoreap" too. As usual, most probably the answer is "no, because it
is too late to change the historical behaviour". But this is off-topic.

It is not clear to me what do_wait() should do with ->autoreap child, even
ignoring ptrace.

Just suppose that real_parent has a single "autoreap" child. Should wait(NULL)
hanf then?

If yes, who will wake the parent up?

If no, I do not see the necessary changes in wait_cosnider_task().

Oleg.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help