Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-29 22:28:40
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:51PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
(reply 1/2 -- I'm replying twice to keep the threading sane) On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
kdbus is a kernel-level IPC implementation that aims for resemblance to the the protocol layer with the existing userspace D-Bus daemon while enabling some features that couldn't be implemented before in userspace.quoted
* Support for multiple domains, completely separated from each other, allowing multiple virtualized instances to be used at the same time.Given that there is no such thing as a device namespace, how does this work?
See the document for the details.
The docs seem a bit confusing to me as to whether there's a hierarchy of domains. Do domains have a concept of a parent?
Yes.
What's "container-name"?
Is that used in the documentation?
Given that domains have random IDs, how can they be checkpointed and restored?
Good question, I don't know about checkpoint/restore, but I think that has been done. Daniel would know more than I do about that. thanks, greg k-h