[PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-10-23
[PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Cyrill Gorcunov <hidden> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-12-02
Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Christopher Covington <hidden> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Shuah Khan <hidden> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Shuah Khan <hidden> · 2014-12-01
Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-12-02
[PATCH 2/3] selftests/kcmp: Don't include kernel headers · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/kcmp: Don't include kernel headers · Cyrill Gorcunov <hidden> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Cyrill Gorcunov <hidden> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Cyrill Gorcunov <hidden> · 2014-10-23
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Shuah Khan <hidden> · 2014-12-01
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Shuah Khan <hidden> · 2014-12-01
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcmp: Move kcmp.h into uapi · Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> · 2014-12-02

Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/kcmp: Always try to build the test

From: Cyrill Gorcunov <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-23 06:09:17
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:07:14PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:

Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
let the chips fall where they may.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>

kcmp depends on checkpoint/restore config symbol which is known
to work on x86 and (iirc) on arm, that's why x86 was only allowed.
I don't mind to such change but not sure.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help