Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)? Just
checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the
collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;)
Ummm... Odd... I'm surprised StGIT managed to reapply my patches with no
warning. I'll fix the numbering in them.
David
Thread (2 messages)
2 messages,
2 authors,
last reply 2012-02-09