Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable"

2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-02-09 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable"

From: <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-08 23:54:15

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:29:05 GMT, David Howells said:
+#define	ENOAUTHSERVICE	139	/* Authentication service not available */

 #define EHWPOISON	139	/* Memory page has hardware error */
Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)?
Just checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the
collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable"

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-02-09 10:01:45

Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org wrote:
Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)?  Just
checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the
collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;)
Ummm...  Odd...  I'm surprised StGIT managed to reapply my patches with no
warning.  I'll fix the numbering in them.

David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help