Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2008-11-13

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Shared flags

From: Jamie Lokier <hidden>
Date: 2008-11-11 10:09:45
Also in: linux-fsdevel

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:58:17PM +0300, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
quoted
#define O_DENYREAD      004000000 /* Do not permit read access */
#define O_DENYWRITE     010000000 /* Do not permit write access */
#define O_DENYDELETE  020000000 /* Do not permit delete or rename operations*/
 (2) you also need to enforce these semantics in the VFS for local
     filesystems

Now if (2) doesn't cause too much overhead I would say it's fine, if not
I would rather avoid it.
On the face of it, they look like they have similar denial-of-service
potential as mandatory locks.  For example, a root process cleaning
out /tmp gets stuck because a user process has O_DENYDELETE set.

-- Jamie
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help