Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] audit: add support for the openat2 syscall
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2021-05-24 23:04:23
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:58 AM Christian Brauner [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:00:21PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:quoted
The openat2(2) syscall was added in kernel v5.6 with commit fddb5d430ad9 ("open: introduce openat2(2) syscall") Add the openat2(2) syscall to the audit syscall classifier. Link: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/67 Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <redacted> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f5f1a4d8699613f8c02ce762807228c841c2e26f.1621363275.git.rgb@redhat.com (local) --- arch/alpha/kernel/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/ia64/kernel/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/parisc/kernel/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/parisc/kernel/compat_audit.c | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/compat_audit.c | 2 ++ arch/s390/kernel/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/s390/kernel/compat_audit.c | 2 ++ arch/sparc/kernel/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/sparc/kernel/compat_audit.c | 2 ++ arch/x86/ia32/audit.c | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c | 2 ++ include/linux/auditsc_classmacros.h | 1 + kernel/auditsc.c | 3 +++ lib/audit.c | 4 ++++ lib/compat_audit.c | 4 ++++ 16 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
...
quoted
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c index d775ea16505b..3f59ab209dfd 100644 --- a/kernel/auditsc.c +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ #include <linux/fsnotify_backend.h> #include <uapi/linux/limits.h> #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h> +#include <uapi/linux/openat2.h> #include "audit.h"@@ -196,6 +197,8 @@ static int audit_match_perm(struct audit_context *ctx, int mask) return ((mask & AUDIT_PERM_WRITE) && ctx->argv[0] == SYS_BIND); case AUDITSC_EXECVE: return mask & AUDIT_PERM_EXEC; + case AUDITSC_OPENAT2: + return mask & ACC_MODE((u32)((struct open_how *)ctx->argv[2])->flags);That's a lot of dereferncing, casting and masking all at once. Maybe a small static inline helper would be good for the sake of legibility? Sm like: static inline u32 audit_openat2_acc(struct open_how *how, int mask) { u32 flags = how->flags; return mask & ACC_MODE(flags); } but not sure. Just seems more legible to me. Otherwise.
I'm on the fence about this. I understand Christian's concern, but I have a bit of hatred towards single caller functions like this. Since this function isn't really high-touch, and I don't expect that to change in the near future, let's leave the casting mess as-is. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com