Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2020-04-02

RE: [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq()

From: Brian Cain <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-28 02:48:58
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-s390, linux-samsung-soc, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-hexagon-
owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of afzal mohammed
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:08 AM
To: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; linux-
sh@vger.kernel.org; linux-s390@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
mips@vger.kernel.org; linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org; linux-
ia64@vger.kernel.org; linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org; linux-c6x-dev@linux-
c6x.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq()
...
Note 1: sh toolchain is available, but that will not make the  relevant
changes
compile as it has dependency of 64bit arch toolchain,  did try a Kconfig
hack
to make it compile w/ 32bit sh toolchain, but it  failed due to other
reasons
(unknown operands), so gave up on that.
Note 2: hexagon final image creation fails even w/o my patch, but it  has
been ensured that w/ my changes relevant object files are getting  built
w/o
warnings.
Afzal,

	What's the nature of the failure in "Note 2"?

-Brian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help