Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2016-09-11
STALE3563d

Re: [PATCH] atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE

From: Vineet Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-08 18:34:29
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev

On 09/08/2016 11:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:28:18AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
quoted
This came to light when implementing native 64-bit atomics for ARCv2.

The atomic64 self-test code uses CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
to check whether atomic64_dec_if_positive() is available.
It seems it was needed when not every arch defined it.
However as of current code the Kconfig option seems needless

- for CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 it is auto-enabled in lib/Kconfig and a
  generic definition of API is present lib/atomic64.c
- arches with native 64-bit atomics select it in arch/*/Kconfig and
  define the API in their headers

So I see no point in keeping the Kconfig option

Compile tested for 2 representatives:
 - blackfin (CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
 - x86 (!CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64)

Also logistics wise it seemed simpler to just do this in 1 patch vs.
splitting per arch - but I can break it up if maintainer feel that
is better to avoid conflicts.
Works for me; you want me to take this, or do you need it for you ARCv2
patches?
Please do. ARCv2 patch (following shortly) doesn't need it - I selected the
option in orig patch - which I can just take out.

Thx,
-Vineet
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help