Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-20

Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 17:12:57
Also in: linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:56:59AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Waiman Long wrote:
quoted
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
 */

-	while (!READ_ONCE(node->locked)) {
+	while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) {
Hmm this being a polling path, that barrier can get pretty expensive and
last I checked it was unnecessary:
I think he'll go rely on it later on.

In any case, its fairly simple to cure, just add
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() at the end. If we bail because
need_resched() we don't need the acquire I think.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help