Thread (87 messages) 87 messages, 7 authors, 2015-03-26

Re: [PATCH v6 21/30] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_child_max_busnr()

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: 2015-03-12 20:00:55
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:28:30PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
On 2015/3/12 11:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:34:18AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
quoted
Sometimes, we need to know the highest reserved
busnr for children bus. Because parent's
bus->busn_res could have padding in it.
This function return the max child busnr as
pci_scan_child_bus().

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <redacted>
I must have screwed this up.  I don't know where the Signed-off-by from
Fengguang came from, but it shouldn't be there.  And I also screwed up by
adding my own Signed-off-by to the branch while we're still iterating on
this series.  The patches you post should not have my Signed-off-by in
them; I should add that.  But that's my fault because put them in the
branch, and I asked you to pull that branch and modify and repost it.
-.-! I added the Fengguang Signed-off-by, because his kbuild test robot sent a patch to me to fix a building error.
Oh, OK.  I forgot about that.  I think it's OK to include Fengguang's
Signed-off-by for that, but it should come before yours.  Since you're the
one sending the patch, your Signed-off-by should be last in the list.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help