Re: [PATCH v6 21/30] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_child_max_busnr()
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: 2015-03-12 20:00:55
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: 2015-03-12 20:00:55
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:28:30PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
On 2015/3/12 11:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:quoted
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:34:18AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:quoted
Sometimes, we need to know the highest reserved busnr for children bus. Because parent's bus->busn_res could have padding in it. This function return the max child busnr as pci_scan_child_bus(). Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <redacted> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <redacted>I must have screwed this up. I don't know where the Signed-off-by from Fengguang came from, but it shouldn't be there. And I also screwed up by adding my own Signed-off-by to the branch while we're still iterating on this series. The patches you post should not have my Signed-off-by in them; I should add that. But that's my fault because put them in the branch, and I asked you to pull that branch and modify and repost it.-.-! I added the Fengguang Signed-off-by, because his kbuild test robot sent a patch to me to fix a building error.
Oh, OK. I forgot about that. I think it's OK to include Fengguang's Signed-off-by for that, but it should come before yours. Since you're the one sending the patch, your Signed-off-by should be last in the list.