Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected
From: Thorsten Kranzkowski <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-07 19:47:36
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 09:16:27PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 10/07, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:quoted
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:quoted
On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:quoted
Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S. But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs disabled. If this is true, then imho arch/alpha should be fixed. Before this commit task_work_run() enabled irqs, but this was the "side effect" of spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq, we should not rely on this.Could you please test the debugging patch below?Of course. With that patch applied the kernel (ac3d0da) boots again. The trace line is printed about once a second, with values '2' and '4'.Thanks a lot Thorsten! So I'll probably send the patch which enables interrupts in task_work_run(). I guess this needs "if (irqs_disabled())" for lockdep. The question is, should I add the warning to remind that this arch needs a fix?
If you do, then please warn only once, otherwise there will be a lot of warnings :-) Thorsten -- | Thorsten Kranzkowski Internet: dl8bcu@dl8bcu.de | | Mobile: ++49 170 1876134 Snail: Kiebitzstr. 14, 49324 Melle, Germany | | Ampr: dl8bcu@db0lj.#rpl.deu.eu, dl8bcu@marvin.dl8bcu.ampr.org [44.130.8.19] |