Re: alpha: futex regression bisected
From: Richard Henderson <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-20 17:28:48
Also in:
lkml
On 02/20/12 00:20, Michael Cree wrote:
I have noticed some user space problems (pulseaudio crashes in pthread
code, glibc/nptl test suite failures, java compiler freezes on SMP alpha
systems) that arise when using a 2.6.39 or later kernel on Alpha.
Bisecting between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39 (using glibc/nptl test suite as
criterion for good/bad kernel) eventually leads to:
8d7718aa082aaf30a0b4989e1f04858952f941bc is the first bad commit
commit 8d7718aa082aaf30a0b4989e1f04858952f941bc
Author: Michel Lespinasse [off-list ref]
Date: Thu Mar 10 18:50:58 2011 -0800
futex: Sanitize futex ops argument types
Change futex_atomic_op_inuser and futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic
prototypes to use u32 types for the futex as this is the data type the
futex core code uses all over the place.
futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *uaddr,
u32 oldval, u32 newval)
...
: "r"(uaddr), "r"((long)oldval), "r"(newval)
There is no 32-bit compare instruction. These are implemented by
consistently extending the values to a 64-bit type. Since the
load instruction sign-extends, we want to sign-extend the other
quantity as well (despite the fact it's logically unsigned).
So:
- : "r"(uaddr), "r"((long)oldval), "r"(newval)
+ : "r"(uaddr), "r"((long)(int)oldval), "r"(newval)
should do the trick.
r~