Re: XLT366 Memory Compatiblity...
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
Date: 2004-06-08 12:52:50
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
Date: 2004-06-08 12:52:50
On Tue, 2004-06-08 05:46:54 -0600, Ryan Kirkpatrick [off-list ref] wrote in message [ref]:
16Mbit in size. The SIMMs are parity (from the chip count). There is also
So they have an extra parity bit...
a sticker on one of chips that has '3163667/23BT S023039 64MB'. I was told they came out of a Compaq Proliant server (don't know the model). All of this seems to indicate they _should_ be compatible with the XLTs. One XLT366 is able to post AlpahBIOS with either four or eight of these SIMMs installed, and the memory count is either 256MB or 512MB respectively. Yet, when I boot Linux, I get an endless stream of ECC errors and corrections, slowing the system down so badly Linux is never able to fully boot. AlphaBIOS version is 5.66.
...but ECC requires more than one:)
Lastly, I tested them in a Sparc LX (which also takes 72pin parity SIMMs). I installed the maximum of six SIMMs (384MB), and it was able to see the maximum 96MB it supports. Furthermore it was able to boot and run Linux without issue. It appears that as long as the SIMMs are not fully utilized they work fine. When fully utilized, they just don't work.
As I said, parity != ECC.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));